Remaining untouched for around 70 years, the zebra crossing we know so well might soon appear very different after a road safety experiment in the London borough of Westminster to get drivers to reduce their speed.
Although the location wasn’t an accident blackspot the council were receiving reports of children, elderly people, and pushchairs users having trouble crossing the street. The result? What appears to be lumps of concrete sprawled on the road ahead.
Trompe l’oeil
Eight weeks ago, after complaints about the speed of vehicles in affluent St John’s Wood High Street, Westminster Council installed a state-of-the-art £3,000 three dimensional-effect zebra crossing as a traffic-calming measure, at the junction with Wellington Place.
The council chose the site near the crossing pictured on the acclaimed Beatles’ Abbey Road album cover after local parent group NW8 Mums, along with Barrow Hill Junior School, and The St John’s Wood Society campaigned for introducing new safety measures in the street.
Traffic speed also concerned residents, with many arguing the 20mph limit is too fast—if drivers are sticking to the speed limit.
The clever floating effect that attempts to convince motorists they’re about to drive into an obstruction is ‘dual directional’. The design comprises the typical zig-zag lines on the approach and five white stripes across the width of the road. Around the stripes are some added blocks of grey paint that, as the driver approaches, appear to be white blocks on the road.
It’s interesting the experiment proved so effective when, before reaching the new crossing, a red sign reading ‘3D crossing trial marking ahead’ warned motorists.
And because most of the motorists using the street are local, soon after installation, one would expect the illusion would no longer cause anybody to slow down any more than for a standard zebra crossing.
Yet, at the start of the trial, Westminster Council fitted pneumatic tubes across the road to measure the effect the new crossing had on traffic speeds, so the results seem to show that a pedestrian crossing like this does appear to have something blocking the road.
‘Worth a try’
Councillor Tim Mitchell, Cabinet Member for Environment and City Management, said:
“We are delighted it appears to be working so well. Drivers are more cautious and feedback from locals has been positive. It’s really encouraging.”
Councillor Mitchell added, “Our 3D zebra crossing could be the future of road safety across the country and once again Westminster City Council is at the forefront in innovation in bringing this type of crossings to the UK.
“Far from being simply a brilliant innovation that makes the ordinary look eye-grabbing and modern—the 3D effect helps drivers to see the crossing easier.
“It’s been proven to make roads [safer] and is another example of why Westminster has a national reputation for providing excellent local services, driving improvements, and making sure the city is safe and well run.”
A spokesperson for Britain’s Automobile Association (AA) told the BBC the measures were “worth a try” but cautioned “its safety record needed monitoring”.
Edmund King, President of the AA may need convincing that 3D crossings are the answer, but he seemed open to the idea when he said:
“Once the novelty has worn off, will drivers continue to slow down? It should have a full evaluation. But if it’s successful, it could become as popular as Abbey Road.”
The AA suggested that just because the 3D crossing designs proved successful in other locations, the design may not work so well in London because of the city’s road layout. They said London authorities needed to “try new ways” to improve safety as roads grow busier.
Coming to a road near you?
The council—who said the prototype slowed motorists to a crawl—branded the experiment a success so the scheme may now extend across the rest of the borough. Local authorities throughout the United Kingdom are also proposing similar 3D crossings. This won’t alter the fact that, according to a 2018 study, 80% of drivers and pedestrians don’t know how to use zebra crossings.
This is the first time the UK has tried a 3D effect pedestrian crossing, but Transport for London (TfL) first tested illusory speed bumps in Newham, London in 2014, where they lowered traffic speeds by 3mph.
3D crossings used in a similar pilot scheme in New Delhi, India, resulted in average speeds of 31mph plummeting to 19mph. China, France, Germany, and Iceland are among the countries who have also tried out such optical trickery in the name of safer roads.
If the 20mph zones are too fast for the locals of St. John’s Wood, what about the increased pollution levels lower speeds bring, especially outside schools? Fewer vehicles using internal combustion engines seems to be the answer and is the government’s ultimate plan.
Whether the sightseers who visit St John’s Wood to pay tribute to The Beatles at the Abbey Road studios and walk across the legendary zebra crossing will now also visit the 3D crossing for their Instagram snaps, who can tell? In the meantime, here’s a video of the 3D crossing.
What’s your opinion on the new zebra crossing design? Do you think it will be a success across the UK? Tell us your views in the comments.
Absolute waste of money which frankly could be better spent.
Predicted this when they started with 20mph zones. What next 10mph , 5mph. It is time for pedestrians to stop looking at their phones while walking.
Closest I’ve come to hitting a pedestrian at a zebra the fool approached the crossing so I slowed down, then turned around and started to walk away, I got ready to move off (by then I had stopped at the crossing) and he spun round and walked in to the road making less than polite gestures.
The council would have done better to change the “Beatle” zebra into a pelican crossing. This isn’t even the original location shown on the LP cover but bloody idiots from all over the world flock to it to have their photograph taken trying to emulate “The Fab Four”. This phenomenon is so nerve-wracking especially in summer that I stopped using Abbey Road. It would be revealing to know how many accidents have been caused by pedestrians being knocked down while pi***ng around in the road.
Looks like a good idea initially but if it becomes commonplace drivers will just get used to it and not take any notice.
£3000 a go … that would stop anybody in their tracks!
Looks like it would need regular maintenance. Most road markings are worn out as councils try to save cash.
April 1st joke: add real concrete blocks? Maybe not … 🙂
That was my immediate reaction, but then I thought about a local road here that had been re-surfaced and brought back to nice and flat again . . . for 3 DAYS! Then the humps were re-installed and I wondered how much did THAT cost?
Although a specialist paint is needed so as not to wear away too quickly, I would think it would be more economical than a great hump of tarmac, blended into the road surface.
Nice to know my council tax is being put to good use
Just waiting for someone to do an emergency stop because of the 3D effect. The mind boggles as to the possible consequences!
Hear! Hear! And why is “slowing traffic to a crawl” a success story?
Many countries I visit have a ‘Sleeping Policeman’ a few meters from Pedestrian Crossings, this works very well and slows down all vehicles and gives people a better chance and more confidence that they will live!
What a STUPID idea!
£3,000 for a quick paint job, & it still will not detect a pedestrian crossing the road, try this new innovative idea. https://youtu.be/LrE50N1mODo
Might — just about get done for less than £3,000..Why did nobody think of that before!
Perhaps hydraulic ramps might work…..the faster you approach…the ramps raise higher !
A bit like a ‘sleeping policeman’…only this one is awake ?
Again not enough money or tarmac to fill in the potholes, but plenty of money for this!
Locals would know the situation and act no differently .
Strangers might slam on the brakes and maybe cause rear end shunts .So are the new 3D crossings worth it ?
Then you are following too close. Leave enough space to stop in case driver in front does drop anchors.
What a great idea. Yes, some pedestrians are careless, but some drivers are too, and they have a great weight of car/van/lorry to cause injury and death!
Has this been thought through?
Yes when you see something ‘in the road’ you slow down, because you don’t want to run over something/someone. However once you’ve got used to/familiar with running over zebra crossings like this, you may well also run over something else, that you shouldn’t. Don’t you think?
Slowing traffic down appears to be a great way to increase emissions. People want councils to reduce speed near schools etc. Great, lets ensure the young get a lungful of harmful pollutants- but at least they are safe.
Amusingly, my local council decided to put in speed humps at one of their crossing points in a residential area which is 30 metres from a mini roundabout. The effect of this is people wait longer to cross and there are greater emissions and higher noise levels.
Give the people what they want. They’ll only end up with a load of unintended consequences which will defeat the original aim. Similarly, over the past few years I’ve noticed how traffic flow is worse and how people tend to drive less economically and take longer to get wherever. The ones driving supposedly economically are usually the ones who reduce traffic flow the most. Couple that with environmental equipment which has ensured more harmful particles get into our bloodstreams and no wonder cancer is more common. Still, I guess it must be what the people want.
20 mph too fast, because they’ve never seen a car going faster!
Waste of money and yet another dangerous “obstruction” for drivers. Road humps, dangerous chicanes, protruding curbs etc. Means time is spent concentrating on these and less time on what’s really necessary. I wonder how many accidents they cause.
hear one for you to talk about Raise the speed limit by Schools This will work how. Now Kids and Parents (because they are worse than the kids) will NOW have to pay more Attention when crossing the road
At £3,000 the are being ripped off, also would have preferred to have seen the image looking more like a raised speed bump as a floating crossing will soon be ignored, but as there are real spead bumps people unfamiliar to the area would not be sure & would slow down.
The idiot who came up with this idea should use his time in a more productive way, better still sack him and help keep overall costs down. Less pollution, is needed not more. We do not want under utilized huge earners., which also include Hs2 supporters.